Therefore, Should the intent to cause injury is proven and it really is further proven that in the ordinary course of nature, that injury would end in death, that matter is now objective and also the intention to kill (the main aspect that must
The court emphasised that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity on the offense demands the most stringent punishment, thinking of the sanctity of human life and deterrence for prospective offenders.
A survey of PACER customers, conducted in 2021, measured consumer satisfaction and identified areas for improvement with PACER services. The Administrative Office on the U.S. Courts is using the survey results To judge and prioritize potential changes to PACER services and capabilities.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Provided the legal analysis on the topic issue, we are in the view that the claim on the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally seem, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They may be matter to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case from the petitioners for promotion could be viewed as, however, we've been obvious in our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Exercise, topic to availability of vacancy subject to the approval with the competent authority.
94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is properly-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety days. In case the appeal just isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she can then approach the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the 90 days for the department to act has already expired. Over the aforesaid proposition, we are guided from the decision in the Supreme Court inside the case of Dr.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It is additionally a nicely-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
(Interview by email, with Ahmad Rafay Alam, a leading environmental lawyer and activist in Pakistan, August twenty eighth, 2015). Furthermore, the ruling placed a notice and comment restriction on government organizations in regards to projects that could potentially pose a public risk. This case can also be noteworthy, “because it laid down the foundations of all long run public interest litigation introduced before courts for environmental protection.” To cite just one example, following this case, the Supreme Court, citing the Zia decision, found inside the Salt Miners Case (decided on 12th July, 1994) that the right to have water free from pollution and contamination can be a right to life itself.
The court cannot listen to the transfer order challenge since it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders preserving in view that one of the respondents has retired from service as pointed out through the counsel for that respondent university. 12. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order regarding costs. Read more
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe like a foster child. Although the few had two youthful children of their personal at home, the social worker didn't convey to them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report on the court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement inside the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the couple had youthful children.
acquitted the appellants from every one of the charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. (Criminal Revision )
Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses which include self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which may possibly cause reduced charges or acquittal.
Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by law." It truly is well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine read more of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, along with the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release to be a legally identified conviction. Read more
dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded for the appellant in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )